Archive | Diary entries

RSS feed for this section
website-hacked

Holy Schmoly- our site was hacked

As you may have gathered, our site was hacked last month and malware was found. The trouble started shortly after we received an email from a -clearly- very disgruntled IME, referring to his multiple negative reviews on our site’s “rate an IME / IME List“, and stating that we caused upset in those injured workers who were due for an IME assessment with this man. He demanded an apology and requested we delete the reviews pronto…or else… Coincidence? Maybe…

Continue Reading…

diary-of-aworkcover-victim-we-are-back2014 workcovervictimsdiary

aworkcovervictimsdiary-are we doing more harm than good to injured workers?

We refer to some (out of line) comment(s) made on P Sharman’s Tasmanian Insult and Injury site regarding aworkcovervictimsdiary (our site). According to some people, it has been put forward that our site causes more harm than good to injured workers, particularly flagging “a concern that our site spreads misinformation and conspiracy theories, (possibly) contributing to victim behaviour”. Others believe we provide useful and practical information to injured workers and help them navigate the workcover maze… My personal view is that we are filling a pretty dark hole.

Continue Reading…

injured-workers-and-anger stupid keep-a-diary-when-injured-at-wok

Exerpts from an injured worker’s diary

I found this exerpt from my diary in 2010. Just thought I would share it in the interests of helping develop an understanding of some of the realities of having a psychiatric injury and trying to negotiate the Workover that is dressed up as Workcover.
The entry was written when I was enduring months of further serious exacerbations of my injuries by the Workover’s failure to retrain me and assist me in returning to work. Since then I have become homeless, and I have re-experienced problems with both gambling addiction and nicotine addiction, both of which had been in abeyance for a number of years.
I’ve publicised it just as I found it, so please excuse the strong language, I did grow up on a farm. Oh, and the sudden stop, ‘cos that’s how it is when I’m “ooorrrfff” as my father says.

Continue Reading…

defamation-shrink-snippet

IME Shrink threatens us with an unfounded defamation lawsuit

Dear Mr Lawyer -Thank you for your letter. If you were up to date with workcovervictimsdiary.com you would have had no need to threaten us with a “defamation” lawsuit as we already published our reply to your client misguided attempt to advise us, the administrators of workcovervictimsdiary.com of our rights at law.

This and what follows is the official reply we – the site’s administrators – sent to Mr Lawyer of the very retaliatory and well known victorian based bia*ed IME shrink…

Continue Reading…

under-their-skin

aworkcovervictimsdiary is getting under "their" skin!

You may have heard, through the grapevine (comment section), that workcovervictimsdiary.com was, again, threatened with a most unfounded and utterly pathetic lawsuit for “defamation” by an “independent doctor“, a psychiatrist no less! The most unfounded and intimidating “defamation” allegation referred to two anonymously posted comments by two injured workers-dating back almost one year ago!!! –  who had been, unfortunately, “assessed” by this IME psychiatrist and who did not even refer to this “doctor’s” full name, location nor identifiable features! The IME and his/her lawyer were not even capable of giving us an exact date of when the alleged “offensive” comments were published, and not even a link to these”offenses”.

Continue Reading…

Injured workers medical practitioners ought to stand & speak up

You won’t believe it, but during the sheer stress and grief of having my site under DoS attack, I also faced ongoing “denial of service” – basic medical care – from Xchanging and my perceived adversarial case manager. On this occasion they denied me physiotherapy treatment, notwithstanding I suffer from an end stage shoulder which requires a joint replacement. As usual- and despite hundreds of medical reports- “additional information” was requested by my case manager to justify why physio would be “reasonable”. I obviously asked my treating GP to respond to this [outrageous] demand and, to my delight, he formulated an interesting response to my case manager. Injured workers doctors ought to follow his example and speak and stand up against the ill treatment of their injured patients by workcover agents!

Injured workers medical practitioners ought to stand & speak up against ill treatment of their injured patients by workcover agents

The workcover insurance companies are a for-profit business and all and any”benefits” are routinely denied, even to those severely injured workers who are in desperate need. They are trained in the art of bullying, intimidation and denial and will make all injured workers fight for their meager “entitlements”.

The most frightening part is that case manager’s medical knowledge is very limited to non-existent but they can make sweeping decisions that have major impact on the injured worker!

The stance of today’s Case Manager (hell- why I am even bothering to use capital letters here!)  has been termed “adversarial help“, with priorities of simple cost containment set by department heads and supervisors. Not to mention the carrot on the stick – $$$ bonuses for achieving certain KPIs of course!

Letter to my Xchanging case manager written by my treating general practitioner

[Click on the image to enlarge]

 

Isn’t it true that if a workcover insurer (i.e. Xchanging) wants to be in the business/provision of health care to injured workers, then a more CARING attitude needs to be adopted rather than the present adversarial policy?!

Treatment of injured workers by workcover agents

Medical (and like) treatment are routinely delayed or denied away. The longer the money stays in the insurers’ pocket [and investment portfolio], the more desperate the injured workers situation becomes.

And, what’s worse, our workcover system, supposedly to protect injured workers, continues to erode away injured workers rights and benefits, without anyone noticing – except of course the employers and the workcover insurers that have brought about these changes and who profit from it insanely. Look at what’s happening in NSW!

“Starving them (injured workers) out” is the key motto  and modus operandi used by workcover insurers.

Not only is workcover [the workers compensation system]  not there to help, except to help stuff the deep and overflowing pockets of their workcover insurance agents, but it also routinely adds to the enormous burden to be faced by injured workers. It forces a BATTLE for medical (and like) treatment and for general weekly pay, of the very SURVIVAL of the injured worker – and at the same time that it accuses us (injured workers) of faking, exaggerating and malingering it, even the deceased worker of causing it (his/her own death).

What on earth has happened to our good ol’ Australia? A country that now allows workcover, corporation and insurers to literally throw away the lives, and the health of so many injured workers, without caring, and without fear of being exposed or being held accountable? Well, it’s called workers compensation – but I prefer the term workcover terrorism – the very system we thought was there to protect us if we were injured at work.

Workcover case managers and dirty tricks

The (medically untrained) WorkCover case manager

  • Never have to answer the phone – voice mail only
  • Do not return calls – no expiry date either
  • Assume no continuity of care – it appears some insurers change their case managers like underwear
  • Deny petty things like physio a neck pillow, 30 min massage, home help- for what? Don’t they realize how fu**ing demoralizing that is?
  • Can be late with payments without reason. Then don’t answer calls…
  • Order potentially painful Functional Capacity and other repeated”Assessments”  without good reason
  • Order “vocation assessments” when you haven’t slept for a week, can’t see straight from the pain and are actually thinking that you may be best off dead
  • Always infer that you can be cut off at any time
  • Make promises – sometimes in writing- then change their minds
  • Cut people off to see what happens
Workcover insurance case managers will use any means necessary to pay out as little as possible, even on legitimate claims that involve serious injuries.

Workcover insurance case managers receive extensive training on how to save the insurance company money, and not necessarily on how to examine a claim and pay a fair settlement.

Many workcover insurance companies reward their case managers and claims managers with bonuses or promotions based on how much money that person saves the company rather than how many claims are resolved.

The claims manager/case manager accomplishes this in many ways:
  • Using Delay tactics: The case manager is a master of using delay tactics to wear people down. He knows that many people will at some point throw up their hands and say “enough!” and finally accept the workcover insurance company’s last offer just to be over and done with the whole stressful process.
  • Requesting Unnecessary Information: Another method is when the case manager makes repeated requests for “documentation” even if the information will have little or no bearing on benefit to be approved service or the amount that will be offered in “settlement”. Repeated requests for unnecessary documentation can easily frustrate people and wear them down so they’re more likely to accept a lower benefit or settlement offer.
  • Disputing the Medical Treatment: Another way the case manager will try to minimise your claim is to dispute or question your need for medical treatment, despite having no medical training! (and even if the treatment is prescribed by their own doctor!). Often it does not matter to the case manager that your treatment has been recommended by a reputable  physician or specialist. A “triple play” is very common with doctors’ requests for medical tests such as MRIs. The insurance case manager delays response to the doctors office’s request for approval, then requests “documentation from the doctor” and then the case manager says the MRI is not necessary. Six months later, you finally get the MRI and the correct treatment. What has the delay cost you? A slow medical recovery, lots of pain, financial stress and possibly the loss of your job!
  • Failing to Advise an Injured Worker of All His Benefits or Any of his Obligations. The case manager doesn’t have to tell you that certain types of benefits even exist! I have never known in my 7 years on workcover  a case manager to freely give this information. What is worse than not getting “fully made whole” is to lose your benefits altogether, i.e. because of time limits!
  • Acting as Your Friend. There are times when the case manager from hell will try to “befriend” you and make it appear that she is watching out for your interests when in fact she is not. Sometime the case manager will give you advice about the type or frequency of your medical treatment, and then decide later on not to pay for the treatment because it is “excessive.” The worst is directing you to change physicians to a “company doctor.” (i.e. a doctor who is more easily persuaded to state nothing is wrong with you and certify you fit for work.)
  • Making False Promises. There are times when the case manager will make promises to you that he or she knows can’t be met. For example, I know of a fellow workcover victim who was promised that the workcover  insurance company would pay for her to go to TAFE course. This went on for months until the injured worker was resigning her light duty position and retiring to attend the full time TAFE courses. The problem was that the injured worker didn’t find out about the insurance company’s decision  not to pay for the classes until she had resigned!

All this can have a devastating effect on someone who is severely injured and lives with chronic pain.

This jerking-around can be one of the ultimate forms of social rejection. Not only do injured people feel the pain of their mistreatment, they are now having to look at the future in a new light – one of victimisation and ongoing dread.

 

[Post dictated]

http://wp.me/p1MA9G-3pk

 

Who is investigating the multi-layered administration driving the costs of workers comp?

I refer to an earlier article stating that the Australian Medical Association (AMA) has told the NSW state parliamentary inquiry that poor administration and red tape are to blame for blowouts in the NSW workers’ compensation scheme. The AMA NSW vice president told the inquiry that benefits to the genuinely injured and disabled wouldn’t have to be cut if administration could be streamlined. And I ask myself the question who is actually investigating the mega-layered administration which is clearly driving workers compensation costs?

Who is investigating the multi-layered administration driving the costs of workers comp?

Fact is that when you have suffered a workplace injury, and even though your liability for your injury may have been accepted by the insurer, the injured worker becomes not only the suspect but also the enemy – and hundreds of thousands of dollars are spent by insurance companies just in order to mitigate their losses, by endless bureaucracy, administration and red tape. That is:  insurance companies will put the suspect and the enemy under increased scrutiny, by delaying and denying legitimate benefits (i.e. medical and like services) and by sending the injured workers to endless so called independent medical examinations (in the hope to have their injuries or capacity for work changed); utterly useless rehab service providers and repeatedly demanding the same information over and over again in order to approve or – more likely- to deny a service (i.e physio, home help, counseling etc.). The bureaucracy [administration and red tape] and attached costs involved is actually mind-boggling.

Multi-layered administration examples

Physio

Just to give you a recent example, I was not long ago asked by my treating upper limb surgeon and GP ” to have a crack at physiotherapy” in order to help me re-enlocate repeated shoulder joint dislocations or subluxations and to help unlock my shoulder blade which has recently started turning 90 degrees, with the tip of the shoulder blade literally moving into my armpit. A medical referral to a my (former) physiotherapist was subsequently made and sent to my case manager for approval.

I attended 2 physio sessions and submitted the account (I had paid for myself) to my case manager along with the medical referal (prescription) for physio and a copy of an email from my upper limb surgeon requesting I have a go at physio with a focus on scapulo-thoracic exercises.

My submitted accounts for physio were rejected and sent back to me along with a letter stating that physio is “unreasonable” for me, however,  provided I could submit them a detailed letter/report from my treaters – within 28 days- explaining the need for physio, the relationship between my injury and phsyio; why physio is reasonable, explain the gap in treatment and provide them with a detailed physio treatment plan; my case manager may review the information supplied and review her decision to deny me prescribed physiotherapy.

I emailed my case manager again and explained to her that I did not understand the need for the “additional information” (a lengthy report), given that I had undergone 7 massive but failed shoulder reconstructions; had been diagnosed barely 6 months ago with an irreparable shoulder, end stage traumatic osteo-arthritis and end stage rotator cuff failure, which requires the insertion of a reverse joint prosthetic, as detailed in my upper limb surgeon’s surgical and follow up reports, including a medico-legal report dated April describing the rapidly deteriorating shoulder status and prognosis as “dreadful”. In addition I pointed out to her that the barely 12 month old “independent medical assessment” also clearly stated that I would need “indefinite supportive and palliative care”. I attached all reports and again ensured she understood that she was denying me physiotherapy on a joint that needs an urgent prosthetic. I also pointed out to her that my former case manager had taken it upon her uneducated self to cease my physiotherapy treatments 2 years ago (even though I underwent another 2 surgeries after that and was prescribed physio!) and this explained the “gap” in treatment, as she should be aware of.

Well, it wasn’t good enough for my thick case manager stated she needed a new report/letter from my treaters explaining the mechanics of my initial worklplace injury (8 years ago); my injury status; the relationship between my injury and physio, why physio would be reasonable etc.

So even though I sent her recent pictures of my shoulder, the reports and the referral letter for physio and that she has – indeed- more than enough hard evidence [I am talking about more than 50 medical reports] to make the decision that hey, physio is reasonable on such a severe injury, physio is still denied to me!

It is a false economy! Considering that the workcover insurer now has to pay for additional visits to my GP and surgeon (to request the report and give them a copy of all the questions that need answering); they have to pay for my transport (taxis) and for the reports that will be prepared (probably $250 each). So in order to try to deny me an entirely appropriate, reasonable and legit treatment, and not to pay for a $136 physio account, they will happily pay around $1000 all together (medical appointments, taxis, reports). So in the end my benefit will have cost them $136 but they will have spend 10 times the amount ($1000) plus hospital emergency department visits so I can have the severely painful dislocations rest 

…and then they blame “injured workers” for massive workers comp blowout costs? Think again!

Home help

Another insane example is that I was denied home help. Part of the process required an “OT assessment” (which costs money). Subsequently I requested a “senior review” after my heart had failed as well during the last surgery. Another OT assessment was undertaken and still I was denied hone help. The matter went to conciliation. This cost the insurer about $750 just on medical reports (ortho surgeon, GP, pain specialist). The conciliator eventually had to refer the matter of “home help” to a full medical panel as I wanted to have a most reasonable 2 hrs of cleaning per week rather than the 1.5 hours per fortnight offered by the smug insurance representative. Now, brace yourself, because I also had to be assessed by a psychiatrist at the medical panel (WTF!) for “home help” on this shoulder, as well as by a panel of another “3 experts”. The medical panel charges a flat fee of $5000 and this does not even include additional medical reports I submitted (and insurer paid for). The psychiatric assessment for “home help” also re-traumaitzed me half to death, having to regurgitate all the traumas that happened to me (incl. 2 near deaths). The consequence was that I suffered from a severe PTSD crisis, which needed intensive medical treatment. So the insurer now also had to pay for psychiatric and psychology services (treatment) as well as new additional medication. Again, what did I as the injured worker “benefit” out of this insane bureaucracy? And how much did the insurer pay in order to attempt to avoid having to pay for increased home help? The money they spent on this could have bought me home help for 2 or 3 years! And because of the insane delays (red tape) I found myself without much needed, medically prescribed help for an extra year, which only aggravated my physical (and emotional) condition.

This is the reality. This is how workcover “works”.

Bureaucrats fear their superiors and try desperately to impress them.
Bureaucrats suppress their humanity and sense of decency.
Bureaucrats praise their own accomplishments in order to obscure their cruelties.
Bureaucracies protect and hide the incompetent.

As evidenced just by those two examples alone, workcover insurance companies are part of the “problem” and definitely not the “solution”. They are nothing but major players in the multi-layers of bureaucracy and administration which costs the public purse (the government) a fortune within the workcover system.

I have been asking myself over and over again

  • I ask myself who on earth is investigating the multi-layered administration which is driving the workers compensation and cause “massive budget blowouts”, for which people like Barry O’ Farrell believes injured workers are responsible – given that in his uneducated opinion injured workers’ meagre benefits need to be cut even further?
  • I also ask if there are any additional team or personal bonuses being paid to insurance companies or case managers when benefits (i.e. physio, home help, counselling, surgery, MRI etc) are successfully denied to injured workers?
  • I ask whether any team or individual bonuses are being paid when injured workers are sent back to work (and as such cut off weekly pay) – regardless of their injury status (i.e. certified unfit for all work by own specialists, even IMEs)?
  • The lower echelons of workcover insurances (i.e. case managers) repeatedly and consistently call, threaten and even bully our own treating doctors and specialists ‘fishing’ for a way to have their injured patients returned to work regardless of the medical status of the injured patients – does this mean that insurance companies (and staff) receive bonuses for shunting injured workers back to work regardless of their medical condition? To me, it certainly appears that insurance companies work on a “sales man” model, where monetary incentives are given for achievements
  • Why are no questions being asked? We challenge the media to investigate and to uncover the truth
  • Like any other type of bureaucracy, it feeds of the “system” – and I ask myself why has this not been audited (and re-audited) and why is the public not informed?
  • In my experience workcover insurances recruit front line people (those working in the trenches such as case managers) who are extremely young, inexperienced, totally under-trained, who have not even basic anatomy knowledge and who lack the experience, maturity and knowledge to handle such responsibilities (such as denying vital medical care, forcing badly injured workers to work and in doing so seriously aggravating their injuries etc.) These case managers are not only unable to read our medical or case file notes; they do not acquaint themselves with our cases (i.e. the need to demand the same medical information over and over again); they have no medical training whatsoever and yet are very much involved in our medical care and are in “constant” communication (coercion) with our doctors.
  • They (case managers)  also “come and go” faster than you can change socks; and I wonder whether they are burnt out, did they leave, are they overworked, simply insufficiently trained, immature, dumb, glorified clerks or are they simply too inexperienced for this level of responsibility?
  • Insurance companies and their case managers are simply injured workers’ greatest adversaries; and should also be viewed – in my opinion – as the workers comp schemes worst enemy. How else can one explain their illogical behaviour and their reckless wasting of hundreds of thousands of precious dollars per injured worker? They are not “working” for injured workers! They do not care about our well-being. Fact is case managers rarely answer our phone calls; they only call in a harassing and intimidating manner if they are after something; they never show respect and always assume an attitude of hostility and POWER. Most are definitely very young and inexperienced, save for a few old hags whose job it is to “deal with difficult clients” (meaning finding ways to cut off benefits, services from even the most seriously injured workers).
  • Every single case manager that I have had over my 8 year ordeal demonstrated that they had not even brought themselves up to date with my case, injury and needs – again well demonstrated by repeatedly demanding (not asking) for 9costly) medical (or other) information they already had.
I/we really challenge the media and/or any supportive politician to investigate all the above – millions of dollars could be saved from the “growing workcover schemes’ deficits” simply from addressing the insane bureaucracy, administration, red tape and immature, under-trained, hostile (and possibly overworked) insurance stakeholders.

 

[Post predicated and entered on behalf of WCV]

http://wp.me/p1MA9G-3iG