Archive | Disputes

RSS feed for this section
review-workcover-nsw comcare-aka-con-care

Disputing decisions by Comcare

We receive a lot of questions re Comcare, particularly on how decisions can be disputed. Many Comcare decisions can be disputed, such as rejection of the claim, decisions to cease your benefits or a decision not to pay for certain medical treatment and/or pay you lump sum compensation for your permanent impairment, and even unreasonable decisions re your RTW.

Continue Reading…

conciliation-process-vic

How to dispute or challenge workcover insurer decision in Victoria

The aim of conciliation in Victoria is to resolve disputes and avoid litigation. The injured worker can request conciliation if there is a dispute between the injured worker and the agent (insurer) and/or employer about the injured worker’s claim. What’s more, if your WorkCover insurer fails to respond to a request within 28 days you can also lodge a Conciliation.

Continue Reading…

requesting-conciliation-vic

If workcover vic fails to respond within 28 days you can go to conciliation

In Victoria, if your WorkCover insurer makes a decision in writing that you disagree with you can appeal the decision at Conciliation. However, what many injured workers don’t know is that if your WorkCover insurer fails to respond to a request within 28 days, you can also lodge a request for Conciliation!

Continue Reading…

medical-panels-should-be-recorded-supreme-court

Medical Panel examinations – beyond belief they are not recorded – Supreme Court Vic

In a fairly recent (August 2013) scorching  judgment related to a medical panel process, the Victorian Supreme Court has found an injured workers’ compensation dispute could have been easily resolved if the medical panel examination of the injured worker had been tape recorded.

Continue Reading…

medical-panel-workcover

Medical Panel acted unreasonably – Supreme Court Victoria

The Supreme Court recently (March 2014) found that a Victorian Medical Panel for a workcover matter acted unreasonably by failing to let an injured worker explain alleged inconsistencies between the surveillance footage obtained from the worker and the worker’s reported medical history, symptoms and presentation. The famous ‘gotcha’ video showed the injured worker “moving freely”, and as a consequence the injured worker’s condition was no longer deemed “serious”. Again, this case, reinforces that our Medical Panels are also flawed and that they too can be prejudiced.

Continue Reading…

psychiatry-prove-mind-doesnt-exist

The assessment of psychiatric impairment

With the recent rise in workcover, common law and civil claims involving alleged psychiatric injury, knowledge of how psychiatric impairment is assessed is critical to determining whether an injured worker is entitled to a lumpsum or general damages.

Continue Reading…

medical-panel-victoria

Medical Panel to only assess injuries subject of the Certificate of Assessment of Degree of Impairment

In September 2013, the Victorian Supreme Court determined that the Convenor of Medical Panels (in Victoria) cannot convene a Medical Panel to assess a psychiatric injury on the basis of a bare allegation in a statement of claim of a psychological reaction to a physical injury in circumstances where the injured worker (or his/her lawyer) has only served a certificate of assessment relating to a physical injury. So, in other words: no assessment will be undertaken without a Certificate.

Continue Reading…

medical-panel-appeal medical-panel-logo

High Court Vic limits Medical Panel Opinions to specific circumstances

The court of appeal handed down a decision in December 2012 concerning Medical Panels that may have wide ranging ramifications for all workcover recipients. In Kocak v Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty. Ltd. & Goodyear Tyres Pty. Ltd. [2012] VSCA 259 the court was required to examine whether a prior Medical Panel decision was binding on a subsequent Court deciding an entitlement under the Accident Compensation Act (The Act).

Continue Reading…