Are WorkCover’s liabilities all smoke and mirrors?

If  we were to peer into Mr’s Pearce’s O’Farrel’s brains we can see what they’re probably thinking:

Protect employers from premium increases, keep paying insurers for their stellar work.  How do we pay for this?  Take away entitlements from those free-riding parasites – Injured workers.  The money to pay for unfunded liabilities have to come from somewhere.

It all sound like the ‘Coalition of the Willings’ reason for invading Iraq.  Saddam was hiding something (like WMD) only to find that was never the case.  Then it was because he was harbouring terrorists, WRONG AGAIN – yet we all knew from the outset that it was about the oil.   I wonder what this Government is trying to hide?

That’s right! WorkCover’s complete and utter incompetence.  And injured workers are a RICH resource they can plunder?  What a joke! And does this deficit really exist?

The state government has been accused of exaggerating WorkCover’s liabilities to create a smokescreen for slashing benefits to injured workers.

Unions NSW today told a parliamentary inquiry into the NSW Workers Compensation Scheme that the government has been diverting attention away from the real reasons behind the scheme’s $4 billion deficit.

Unions NSW Secretary Mark Lennon said WorkCover’s unfunded liability had been “wildly exaggerated to create a sense of crisis, so that the government can cut payments to sick and injured workers, in the name of allegedly helping business”.

“The $4 billion figure being bandied about is based on a worst-case scenario,” he said.

“While some reform of the scheme is necessary, the real savings need to come from claims agents and administrative costs, which are the real drivers of unfunded liabilities.

“Sick and injured workers must not have their entitlements cut because of a blow-out in administrative costs.”

Unions NSW’s submission to the parliamentary inquiry says the government has exaggerated the risk margin of the WorkCover scheme, which is publicly underwritten.

Insurance premiums for employers have fallen by 33 per cent since 2005, removing $1 billion from the scheme, despite an increase in the rate of serious workplace injuries.

While the government has said NSW should have lower premiums to match those in Victoria, it has failed to acknowledge that NSW has a much higher rate of serious injuries than Victoria.

Private insurers have also increased the amount they claim from the scheme at a rate that is way above inflation.

An issues paper released by Finance Minister Greg Pearce outlines possible measures for cutting benefits to injured workers and removing journey claims.

Unions NSW says the paper fails to discuss the WorkCover Board’s management of the scheme or to consider the performance of WorkCover’s claims agents.

It also says the government has been silent on how it will help workers return to work, other than by cutting their benefits.

“When WorkCover schemes encounter financial difficulties, politicians find it expedient to reduce scheme costs by targeting the entitlements of injured workers rather than tackle the underlying causes,” the submission says.

“The reluctance of governments to scrutinise the actions of scheme administrators, their claims agents and employers, especially in view of the pivotal roles they play in the functioning and financial performance of workers’ compensation schemes, is a deep-seated, perennial problem and a major obstacle to genuine reform.”

The Australian Manufacturing Workers Union today warned the state government it would fight any unfair cuts in benefits for injured workers.

“Premier [Barry] O’Farrell and the employer lobby are on notice that if they buddy up to slash the entitlements of injured manufacturing workers and bereaved families, we will take them on,” NSW secretary Tim Ayres said.

“Manufacturing is the most dangerous industry in NSW by far, generating the highest number of serious workplace injuries. We had a tragic fatality in western Sydney just yesterday.”

The Australian Manufacturing Workers Union is looking into top-up insurance to cover any shortfall in injured workers’ entitlements if benefits under the workers compensation scheme are cut.

Mr Ayres said the AMWU said the insurance cover might be more expensive than the premium reductions the government had delivered to manufacturing businesses.

The AMWU has enterprise agreements with about 500 manufacturing businesses in NSW.

“As each of these agreements comes up for renegotiation we will be including our claim for top-up insurance,” Mr Ayres said.

“If NSW employers want to save money on workers’ comp premiums, they should focus on reducing their premiums by providing safer workplaces where workers don’t get injured and killed.”
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/workcovers-liabilities-exaggerated-to-slash-hurt-workers-benefits-unions-20120525-1z9ox.html#ixzz1vs0OoyK2

About Workcovervictims

We are the authors, co-authors, seriously injured workers and invisible supporters (incl. abled family members and friends) behind A Diary of a WorkCover Victim. We hope this site, our and many other injured workers’ stories will somehow help other injured workers navigating the murky waters of the workcover system, and, at the very least, teach you to be extremely diligent in finding out your legitimate rights, always questioning the “system” in order to keep some sort of control within the workcover system. The workers compensation is – in our opinion- extremely adversarial and they use tactics to wear you down, to make you emotionally bleed out, to break you, all in order to weaken your position and to maximise their insane profits.

, ,

One Response to Are WorkCover’s liabilities all smoke and mirrors?

  1. John McPhilbin May 25, 2012 at 10:08 PM #

    PWC blows the fear campaign about rising premiums out of the water -  an 8% increase over 10 years is much less expected rises in inflation.  Businesses have absolutely nothing to fear from premium increases as modest as this.

    Mr O’Farrell has cited a PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) actuarial report stating premiums would have to be increased by 28 per cent to bridge the deficit in five years.

    But giving evidence before the parliamentary committee on Friday, unions backed PwC’s other finding that an eight per cent increase over 10 years would see the deficit disappear.

    http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1653159/NSW-families-on-street-with-compo-cuts

Leave a Reply

Attach a file Uploading File types: jpg, png, gif,doc,docx,pdf,ppt,txt,wmv,flv,rtf,mp4,mp3,swf,zip, Max size: 500Mbytes, Max count: 3