Fact, quite a few independent medical examiners (IMEs) often attempt to minimise the injured worker’s condition and allege the injured worker is “exaggerating” his/her pain. Some claim or imply that the only thing that will cure you is money. It’s happened to me, it’s happened to countless other injured workers. I have amused myself compiling a list of questions we should ask those ignorant IMEs. For example: “Dear IME, if money cures the condition and takes away the pain, then does that mean that you regularly prescribe “money” to your own patients suffering from these same conditions? Enjoy!
Empowering injured workers | Exposing the workcover conspiracy
Recent ProjectsView more projects
While any workcover settlement (or closure of claim) does NOT take an injured worker’s pain and/or disability away; once the injured worker feels that s/he is no longer imprisoned and under constant scrutiny by the work-over system, there is then room for “living”. There is nothing like experiencing freedom from being surveilled, judged, made accountable, having to comply with directives from insurance vultures and…from being treated like vermin.
Injured workers and motorists (in Tasmania, but we believe in every state really) are increasingly being subjected to intrusive, costly and potentially unlawful surveillance, Slater and Gordon Hobart lawyer Brian Hilliard said, in an article published in The Mercury.
“I feel that my story should be out there stating that I have been unjustly done by both the WorkCover Insurer and the Medical panel”, writes injured worker “R”. In essence “R” suffered a back injury and a hip injury, the latter discovered some months after the accident. The insurer accepted liability for both his back and hip injury, and even paid for “R”‘s first hip surgery. However the insurance company refused liability for further hip surgery, based on both an IME and a Medical Panel opinion who indicated his hip injury was not caused by his accident at work…Go figure!